Preview

Russian Sklifosovsky Journal "Emergency Medical Care"

Advanced search

Outcomes of treatment for posttraumatic epidural hematomas

https://doi.org/10.23934/2223-9022-2025-14-4-682-693

Abstract

Relevance. Epidural hematomas occur in 8.2% of all patients with traumatic brain injury, more than half of whom require surgical treatment. Most patients with this condition have a favorable outcome with an uncomplicated clinical course. However, the clinical course of epidural hematomas depends mainly on the presence of additional intracranial injuries. There are few studies that compare in detail the results of treatment of isolated (without additional intracranial injuries) and combined (with additional intracranial injuries) variants of epidural hematomas.

Aim. Оf the study Analysis of treatment outcomes in patients with isolated and combined types of epidural hematomas.

Material and methods. We conducted a retrospective, single-center, cohort study at the Mariinsky City Hospital from April 2015 to December 2019. We included 129 patients in the study. 68 (52.7%) patients had the isolated version of epidural hematoma, 61 (47.3%) patients had the combined version of epidural hematoma. 81 (62.8%) patients were men, and 48 (37.2%) were women. The average patient age was significantly higher in the group with the combined version of epidural hematoma (48.3 years versus 32.7 years, p=0.001). The average follow-up time was more than 5 years.

Results. With increasing age, the combined variant of epidural hematoma had a higher incidence rate than the isolated variant of epidural hematoma. The in-hospital mortality rate in patients in the sample was 3.1%, in the group with the isolated variant of epidural hematoma 1.5% (1 patient), and 4.9% (3 patients) in the group with combined epidural hematoma. A good favorable outcome was achieved in 84 patients (65.1%), in the group with the isolated variant of epidural hematoma this figure was 88.2% (60 patients), in the group with the combined variant of epidural hematoma 41.4% (24 patients). Analysis of various additional intracranial injuries in patients with the combined variant of epidural hematomas did not reveal a significant difference in the results. Patients with isolated epidural hematoma had a statistically significantly lower risk of mortality (relative risk: 0.31; 95% CI: 0.11–0.41), and a statistically significantly lower risk of poor outcome according to the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) (relative risk: 0.19; 95% CI: 0.11–0.29) than patients with combined epidural hematomas.

Conclusion. In general, patients with surgically treated isolated epidural hematomas have a positive favorable outcome. In addition, favorable outcomes can be achieved in 50% of cases in patients with combined epidural hematomas or isolated epidural hematomas with a low Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score. Therefore, every possible effort should be made to treat and achieve a favorable outcome in this potentially fatal injury.

About the Authors

A. Yu. Rynda
City Mariinsky Hospital
Russian Federation

Artemii Yu. Rynda, Candidate of Medical Sciences, Neurosurgeon, Department of Emergency Neurosurgery No.

Liteiny Prospekt 56, Saint Petersburg, 19101



O. A. Pavlov
City Mariinsky Hospital; S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy
Russian Federation

Oleg A. Pavlov, Candidate of Medical Sciences, Neurosurgeon, Head, Department  of Emergency Neurosurgery No.1, City Mariinsky Hospital; Assistant Professor, Department of Neurosurgery, S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy

Liteiny Prospekt 56, Saint Petersburg, 191014,

Akademika Lebedeva Str. 6, Saint Petersburg, 194044

 



M. Yu. Podgornyak
City Mariinsky Hospital
Russian Federation

Marina Yu. Podgornyak, Candidate of Medical Sciences, Neurosurgeon, Department of Emergency Neurosurgery No.1

Liteiny Prospekt 56, Saint Petersburg, 19101



References

1. Leitgeb J, Mauritz W, Brazinova A, Majdan M, Wilbacher I. Outcome after severe brain trauma associated with epidural hematoma. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013;133(2):199–207. PMID: 23161150 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-012-1652-y

2. Irie F, Le Brocque R, Kenardy J, Bellamy N, Tetsworth K, Pollard C. Epidemiology of traumatic epidural hematoma in young age. J Trauma. 2011;71(4):847–853. PMID: 21336188 https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3182032c9a

3. Rahimi A, Corley JA, Ammar A, Shlobin NA, Rolle M, Mekary RA, et al. The unmet global burden of cranial epidural hematomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2022;219:107313. PMID: 35688003 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2022.107313

4. Gutowski P, Meier U, Rohde V, Lemcke J, von der BC. Clinical outcome of epidural hematoma treated surgically in the era of modern resuscitation and trauma care. World Neurosurg. 2018;118:e166–е174. PMID: 29959068 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.06.147

5. Marhold F, Prihoda R, Pruckner P, Eder V, Glechner A, Klerings I, et al. The importance of additional intracranial injuries in epidural hematomas: detailed clinical analysis, long-term outcome, and literature review in surgically managed epidural hematomas. Front Surg. 2023;10:1188861. PMID: 37592941 https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1188861 eCollection 2023.

6. Lee EJ, Hung YC, Wang LC, Chung KC, Chen HH. Factors influencing the functional outcome of patients with acute epidural hematomas: analysis of 200 patients undergoing surgery. J Trauma. 1998;45(5):946–952. PMID: 9820707 https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199811000-00017

7. Wilson JTL, Pettigrew LE, Teasdale GM. Structured interviews for the Glasgow outcome scale and the extended Glasgow outcome scale: guidelines for their use. J Neurotrauma. 1998;15(8):573–580. PMID: 9726257 https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.1998.15.573

8. Jennett B, Snoek J, Bond MR, Brooks N. Disability after severe head injury: observations on the use of the Glasgow outcome scale. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1981;44(4):285–293. PMID: 6453957 https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.44.4.285

9. Haselsberger K, Pucher R, Auer LM. Prognosis after acute subdural or epidural haemorrhage. Acta Neurochir. 1988;90(3–4):111–116. PMID: 3354356 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01560563

10. Balik V, Lehto H, Hoza D, Phornsuwannapha S, Toninelli S, Romani R, et al. Post-traumatic frontal and parieto-occipital extradural haematomas: a retrospective analysis of 41 patients and review of the literature. Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2011;72(4):169–175. PMID: 22012694 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1286261

11. Mauritz W, Brazinova A, Majdan M, Leitgeb J. Epidemiology of traumatic brain injury in Austria. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2014;126(1–2):42–52. PMID: 24249325 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-013-0456-6

12. Carney N, Totten AM, O’Reilly C, Ullman JS, Hawryluk GW, Bell MJ, et al. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury, fourth edition. Neurosurgery. 2017;80(1):6–15. PMID: 27654000 https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000001432

13. Stocchetti N, Paternò R, Citerio G, Beretta L, Colombo A. Traumatic brain injury in an aging population. J Neurotrauma. 2012;29(6):1119–1125. PMID: 22220762 https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2011.1995

14. Andersson EH, Björklund R, Emanuelson I, Stålhammar D. Epidemiology of traumatic brain injury: a population based study in western Sweden. Acta Neurol Scand. 2003;107(4):256–259. PMID: 12675698 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0404.2003.00112.x

15. Ramanathan DM, McWilliams N, Schatz P, Hillary FG. Epidemiological shifts in elderly traumatic brain injury: 18-year trends in Pennsylvania. J Neurotrauma. 2012;29(7):1371–1378. PMID: 22150090 https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2011.2197

16. Mina AA, Bair HA, Howells GA, Bendick PJ. Complications of preinjury warfarin use in the trauma patient. J Trauma. 2003;54(5):842–847. PMID: 12777897 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.TA.0000063271.05829.15

17. Mina AA, Knipfer JF, Park DY, et al. Intracranial complications of preinjury anticoagulation in trauma patients with head injury. J Trauma. 2002;53(4):668–672. PMID: 12394864 https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-200210000-00008

18. Bershad EM, Farhadi S, Suri MF, Feen ES, Hernandez OH, Selman WR, et al. Coagulopathy and inhospital deaths in patients with acute subdural hematoma: clinical article. J Neurosurg. 2008;109(4):664–669. PMID: 18826353 https://doi.org/10.3171/JNS/2008/109/10/0664

19. Onodera K, Kamide T, Kimura T, Tabata S, Ikeda T, Kikkawa Y, et al. Identification of prognostic factors in surgically treated patients with acute epidural hematoma. Asian J Neurosurg. 2020;15(3):532–536. PMID: 33145203 https://doi.org/10.4103/ajns.AJNS_129_20 eCollection 2020 Jul-Sep.

20. Teasdale G, Maas A, Lecky F, Manley G, Stocchetti N, Murray G. The Glasgow coma scale at 40 years: standing the test of time. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(8):844–854. PMID: 25030516 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70120-6

21. Edwards P, Arango M, Balica L, Cottingham R, El-Sayed H, Farrell B, et al.; CRASH trial collaborators. Final results of MRC CRASH, a randomised placebo-controlled trial of intravenous corticosteroid in adults with head injury - outcomes at 6 months. Lancet. 2005;365(9475):1957–1959. PMID: 15936423 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66552-X

22. Grote S, Böcker W, Mutschler W, Bouillon B, Lefering R. Diagnostic value of the Glasgow coma scale for traumatic brain injury in 18,002 patients with severe multiple injuries. J Neurotrauma. 2011;28(4):527–534. PMID: 21265592 https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2010.1433

23. Aromatario M, Torsello A, D’errico S, Bertozzi G, Sessa F, Cipolloni L, et al. Traumatic epidural and subdural hematoma: epidemiology, outcome, and dating. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021;57(2):11–16. PMID: 33535407 https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57020125

24. Guo C, Liu L, Wang B, Wang Z. Swirl sign in traumatic acute epidural hematoma: prognostic value and surgical management. Neurol Sci. 2017;38(12):2111–2116. PMID: 28894943 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-017-3121-4

25. Pruthi N, Balasubramaniam A, Chandramouli BA, Somanna S, Devi BI, Vasudevan PS, et al. Mixed-density extradural hematomas on computed tomography-prognostic significance. Surg Neurol. 2009;71(2):202–206. PMID: 18328546 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surneu.2007.10.032

26. Choi DH, Jeong TS, Kim WK. Clinical outcome of patients diagnosed traumatic intracranial epidural hematoma with severe brain injury (Glasgow coma scale ≤8) who undergo surgery: a report from the Korean Neuro-Trauma Data Bank System. Korean J Neurotrauma. 2022;18(2):153–160. PMID: 36381437 https://doi.org/10.13004/kjnt.2022.18.e62eCollection 2022 Oct.

27. Mejaddam AY, Elmer J, Sideris AC, Chang Y, Petrovick L, Alam HB, et al. Prolonged emergency department length of stay is not associated with worse outcomes in traumatic brain injury. J Emerg Med. 2013;45(3):384–391. PMID: 23769388 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.04.015

28. Jamjoom A. The influence of concomitant intradural pathology on the presentation and outcome of patients with acute traumatic extradural haematoma. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1992;115(3-4):86–89. PMID: 1605089 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01406363

29. Glechner VA, Persad E, Wagner G, Klerings DI. Postoperativer Outcome bei Epiduralhämatom mit und ohne intrakranielle Verletzungen: Rapid Review. Evidenzbasiertes Informationszentrum für ÄrztInnen. Available at: https://ebminfo.at/postoperativer_outcome_bei_epiduralhaematom [Accessed November 18, 2025].


Review

For citations:


Rynda A.Yu., Pavlov O.A., Podgornyak M.Yu. Outcomes of treatment for posttraumatic epidural hematomas. Russian Sklifosovsky Journal "Emergency Medical Care". 2025;14(4):682-693. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.23934/2223-9022-2025-14-4-682-693

Views: 14

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2223-9022 (Print)
ISSN 2541-8017 (Online)