MICROPOLARIZATION IN THE TREATMENT OF ACUTELY DEVELOPED VERTIGO
https://doi.org/10.23934/2223-9022-2017-6-4-94-100
Abstract
Background Vertigo is the most common complaints addressed to a neurologist. There is few information about a role of physiotherapy in the treatment of vertigo.
Objective: To assess an efficacy of stimulation current physiotherapy in the treatment of acutely developed vertigo.
Material and methods. We examined 44 patients with a single or leading complaint of vertigo. Patients were randomized into two groups. Patients of the test group (22) underwent 2–6 procedures of micropolarization with the «emtc 12-01» device (russia) (4 procedures averagely), and patients of the control group (22) underwent 2–7 procedures simulating microcurrent physiotherapy (placebo) (4 procedures averagely). To assess the outcome of the treatment, all patients were tested on the eev scale (the european evaluation of vertigo) 1 hour prior to the first procedure and immediately after the last one.
Results The initial intensity of vertigo in patients of the test group was higher than in patients of the comparison group (eev 12.4±3.0 and 9.7±2.6 points, respectively (p<0.05)). After the treatment, the results according to eev scale were 4.9±4.4 points (p<0.001 when compared with baseline values) in the test group and 7.8±3.1 points (p<0.05 when compared with baseline values) in the comparison group. The average difference between the eev assessment before and after treatment was significantly higher in the test group (7.5 points (99% ci=4.9-10.1)) than in the comparison group (1.7 points (99% ci=0.2-3.6)) (p<0.01).
In both groups, subgroups of neurological and ent diseases were selected. Differences in the efficacy of treatment in patients between subgroups were not found. The mean difference between the eev assessment before and after treatment was 6.2 (95% ci=3.8-8.6) in patients with neurological diseases and 8.6 points (95% ci=5.5-11.6) in the subgroup of ent diseases; in the comparison group, the difference was 2.1 points (95% ci=-1.0-5.2) and 1.6 (95% ci=-0.5-3.7), respectively.
Conclusion Microcurrent physiotherapy is an effective method of treatment for acute vertigo, and allows to reduce its severity significantly.
About the Authors
E. V. ShevchenkoRussian Federation
Neurologist of the Neurology Department for Patients with ACVE,
Moscow
D. V. Baymuratova
Russian Federation
Moscow
G. R. Ramazanov
Russian Federation
Moscow
S. S. Petrikov
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Karatas M. Central vertigo and dizziness: epidemiology, differential diagnosis, and common causes. Neurologist. 2008; 14(6): 355–364. DOI: 10.1097/NRL.0b013e31817533a3.
2. Gusev E.I., Konovalov A.N., Skvortsova V.I., Gekht A.B. Nevrologiya. Natsional’noe rukovodstvo. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media Publ., 2012. 1040 p. (In Russian).
3. Strupp M., Brandt T. Diagnosis and Treatment of Vertigo and Dizziness. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2008; 105(10): 173–180. DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2008.0173.
4. Hotson J.R., Baloh R.W. Acute vestibular syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1998; 339: 680–685. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199809033391007.
5. Brandt T., Diterikh M., Shtrupp M. Vertigo. Moscow: Praktika Publ., 2009. 200 p. (In Russian).
6. Nguyen-Huynh A.T. Evidence-Based Practice: Management of Vertigo. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2012; 45(5): 925–940. DOI: 10.1016/j.otc.2012.06.001.
7. Kerber K.A., Baloh R.W. The evaluation of a patient with dizziness. Neurol Clin Pract. 2011; 1(1): 24–33. DOI: 10.1212/CPJ.0b013e31823d07b6.
8. Swartz R., Longwell P. Treatment of Vertigo. Am Fam Physician. 2005; 71(6): 1115–1122. PMID: 15791890.
9. Sheremet A.S., Garov E.V., Antonyan R.G., et al. Suppression of attack of the peripheral system vertigo and imbalance. Patent 2392013 Russian Federation, IPC A61N1/00. No. 2008145219/14; st. 18.11.08; publ. 20.06.10, bull. No. 17. 4 p. (In Russian).
10. Gafiyatullina G.Sh., Omel’chenko V.P. Physiotherapy. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media Publ., 2010. 272 p. (In Russian).
11. Megnigbeto C.A., Sauvage J.P., Launois R. The European Evaluation of Vertigo scale (EEV): a Clinical Validation Study. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol. 2001; 122(2): 95–102. PMID: 11715268.
12. Ponomarenko G.N., Abramovich S.G., Adilov V.B. Physiotherapy. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media Publ., 2014. 864 p. (In Russian).
13. Shelyakin A.M., Preobrazhenskaya I.G., Bogdanov O.V. Micro-polarization therapy in pediatric neurology. Moscow: Medkniga Publ., 2008. 120 p. (In Russian).
14. Pavlov I.P. Complete works. Moscow–Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo Akademii nauk SSSR Publ., 1952. Vol. 6. (In Russian).
15. Dontsova. Z.S. The role of background activity in brain activity. Moscow: Meditsina Publ., 1969. 180 p. (In Russian).
16. Rusinov V.S. Dominant. Electrophysiological studies. Moscow: Meditsina Publ., 1969. 232 p. (In Russian).
17. Adey W.R. The cellular microenvironment and signaling through cell membranes. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1988; 257: 81–106. PMID: 3278330.
18. Edelman G.M. Surface Modulation in Cell Recognition and Cell Growth Some new hypotheses on phenotypic alteration and transmembranous control of cell surface receptors. J Science. 1976; 192: 218–226.
19. Vartanyan G.A., Gal’dinov G.V., Akimov I.M. Organization and modulation of memory processes. Leningrad: Meditsina Publ., 1981. 280 p. (In Russian).
20. Polyanskiy Yu.P. Transcranial polarization of the brain in complex treatment of patients with epilepsy: Cand. Med. Sci. Diss. Synopsis. Leningrad, 1982. 18 p. (In Russian).
21. Сostain R., Redfearn J.W.T., Lippold O.C.J. A Controlled Trial of the Therapeutic Effects of Polarization of the Brain in Depressive Illness. Br J Psychiatry. 1964; 110: 786–799. PMID: 14211695.
Review
For citations:
Shevchenko E.V., Baymuratova D.V., Ramazanov G.R., Petrikov S.S. MICROPOLARIZATION IN THE TREATMENT OF ACUTELY DEVELOPED VERTIGO. Russian Sklifosovsky Journal "Emergency Medical Care". 2017;6(4):336-341. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.23934/2223-9022-2017-6-4-94-100