NEW METHODS OF ASSESSING THE LEVEL OF D-DIMER IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF PULMONARY E

BACKGROUND. Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a pathological condition complicating the course of many diseases, which often remains unrecognized. An important role for its diagnosis is given to D-dimer concentration in blood. This marker has a low specificity and a high predictive value of a negative result. The normal level of D-dimer with low clinical probability of pulmonary embolism allows to exclude this diagnosis with an accuracy of 97%. According to the European Society of Cardiologists, the specificity of D-dimer may be improved by the correction of the upper reference values in patients of different age groups. The aim of the study was to calculate the correction coefficient of the normal D-dimer upper limit depending on age in order to improve the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF).

MATERIAL AND METHOD. We surveyed 160 patients over 50 years with suspected pulmonary embolism on the background of CHF of III-IV functional class according to NYHA classification. All patients underwent clinical and biochemical blood tests, d-dimer, echocardiography, Doppler ultrasound, angiography of pulmonary arteries. Based on the results of examination, the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism was set in 102 patients with heart failure of III-IV functional class according to NYHA classification. The level of the proximal occlusion was distributed as follows: main pulmonary artery — 41%, lobar artery — 31%, segmental artery — 28% of patients. All patients had not a high risk of death from pulmonary embolism. In 58 patients with CHF of III–IV functional class and D-dimer above reference values, PE was excluded.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION. In patients with CHF of III–IV functional class (NYHA) over 50 years, the correction of upper limit of D-dimer reference with a coefficient of 0.012 allows to increase the specificity of this marker in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism by 40%.

1. Russian clinical recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolic complications. Flebologiya. 2010; 4(2 Suppl 1): 2–37. (In Russian).

2. Federal statistical supervision of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. Information about the activity of the hospital. Form number 14. Moscow, 2013. Available at: http://miac74.ru/upload/medialibrary/106/ 106aced7775b5be59efb272f034ec6f9.pdf (Accessed 28 August 2017). (In Russian).

3. Avdeev S.N. Thromboembolism of pulmonary arteries. Atmosfera. Pul’monologiya i allergologiya. 2009; (3): 1–8. (In Russian).

4. Kurakina E.A., Duplyakov D.V., Khokhlunov S.M., Kozupitsa G.S. Syncope in non-massive pulmonary embolism as a predictor of high-risk mortality. Ratsional’naya farmakoterapiya v kardiologii. 2012; 8(2): 158–162. (In Russian).

5. Yakovlev V.B., Yakovleva M.V. Thromboembolism of the pulmonary artery: pathophysiology, diagnosis, therapeutic tactics. Consilium Medicum. 2005; 7(6): 493–499. (In Russian).

6. Shevchenko Yu.L., Stoyko Yu.M. Fundamentals of clinical phlebology. Moscow.: Shiko Publ., 2013. 336 p. (In Russian).

7. Agnelli G., Becattini C. Acute Pulmonary Embolism. Engl J Med. 2010; 363(3): 266–274. PMID: 20592294. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra0907731.

8. Vorob’eva N.M., Panchenko E.P., Dobrovol’skiy A.B., Titaeva E.V. Elevated D-dimer in patients with cardiovascular diseases free from thromboembolic complications: what is it associated with and what has to be done? Angiologiya i sosudistaya khirurgiya. 2010; (4): 34–41. (In Russian).

9. Rothwell P.M., Fowkes F.G.R., Belch J.F.F., et al. Effect of daily aspirin on long-term risk of death due to cancer: analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials. Lancet. 2011; 377 (9759): 31–41. PMID: 21144578.

10. Sudzhaeva S.G., Ostrovskiy Yu.P., Sudzhaeva O.A., Kazaeva N.A. Diagnosis and treatment of acute pulmonary embolism. National guidelines of the Republic of Belarus. Minsk, 2010. 68 p. (In Russian).

11. Konstantinides S.V., Torbicki A., Agnelli G., et al. Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J. 2014; 35(43): 3033–3069. PMID: 25173341. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ ehu283.

12. Lippi G., Favaloro E.J, Cervellin G. A review of the value of D-dimertesting in the elderly for prediction of recurrent venous thromboembolism. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2014; 40(6): 634–639. PMID: 25099192. DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1384630.

13. Schouten H.J., Geersing G., Koek H.L., еt al. Diagnostic accuracy of conventional or age adjusted D-dimer cut-off values in older patients with suspected venous thromboembolism: systematic review and metaanalysis. BMJ. 2013; 346: 2492. PMID: 23645857.

14. van Es J., Mos I., Douma R. et al. The combination of four different clinical decision rules and an age–adjusted D–dimer cut–off increases the number of patients in whom acute pulmonary embolism can safely be excluded. Thromb Haemost. 2012; 107(1): 167–171. PMID: 22072293. DOI: 10.1160/TH11-08-0587.