OPPORTUNITIES OF ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE STENTING OF THE BILE DUCTS IN MALIGNANT TUMORS OF THE PANCREATOBILIARY ZONE, COMPLICATED BY OBSTRUCTIVE JAUNDICE

Purpose. In the last 10 years in the treatment of acute jaundice, developed on a background of malignant tumors of the pancreatobiliary zone (PBZ), more preferred method is endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage.

Material and methods. From January 2007 to July 2012 in the clinic of hospital surgery N. 2 PRNMU endoscopic biliary stenting was performed in 441 patients. Of these, 324 (73.5%) stenting fell to 234 patients with a tumor of the extrahepatic bile ducts. The diagnostic program included ultrasonography, computed tomography, endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography.

Results. Installing of bilioduodenal stent in 223 patients (95.3%) was generated after the pre-endoscopic papillosphincterotomy (EPST). The adequacy of the biliary drainage after produced in the required amount of biliary stent placement was achieved in all patients. In 46 cases, execute the biliary tract prosthesis failed. Complications of endoscopic interventions presented with acute pancreatitis, cholangitis, bleeding from the area of EPST, perforated duodenal wall and migration of the stent were in 19 cases (5?9%). Postoperative mortality was 3?8%. 7 patients (3%) died after the endoscopic decompression of the biliary tract. After stenting in all patients with jaundice it was resolved or significantly reduced. In 185 of them (79%) was the definitive guide endoscopic treatment because of severity of tumor process. In cases of jaundice reccurence endoscopic stent recanalizing or re￾placement were performed. In the remaining cases (21%) patients after the resolution of jaundice decompressive surgical intervention were done.

Conclusion. The method of endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage allows you to prepare patients with obstructive jaundice for surgical intervention, including the radical. The frequency of complications after endoscopic retrograde operations on the major duodenal papilla for acute jaundice blastomatous origin did not differ from that after the standard retrograde interventions and was 6%. 

1. Блохин Н.Н., Итин А.Б., Клименков А.А. Рак поджелудочной железы и внепеченочных желчных путей. – М.: Медицина, 1982. – 272 с.

2. Данилов М.В., Глабай В.П., Кустов А.Е и др. Хирургическое лечение больных механической желтухой опухолевой этиологии // Анналы хирургической гепатологии. – 1997. – Т. 2. – С. 110–116.

3. Ившин В.Г., Якунин А.Ю., Лукичев О.Д. Чрескожные диагностические и желчеотводящие вмешательства у больных механической желтухой. – Тула, 2000. – С. 30.

4. Лапкин К.В., Малярчук В.И., Иванов В.А. и др. Основные направления в снижении риска при хирургическом лечении билиопанкреатического рака // Первый Московский международный конгресс хирургов: тез. докл. – М., 1995. – С. 264–266.

5. Sherman S., Lehman G., Earle D., et al. Endoscopic palliation of malignant bile duct obstructions: improvement in quality of life // Gastrointest. Endosc. – 1996. – Vol. 43, N. 4. – P. 321.

6. Маады А.С. Обоснование применения эндоскопических способов дренирования желчных путей при злокачественных новообразованиях органов панкреатобилиарной зоны, осложненных механической желтухой: дис. … канд. мед. наук. – М., 2002. – 139 с.

7. Brugge W.R., Lee M.J., Kelsey P.B., et al. The use of EUS to diagnose malignant portal venous system invasion by pancreatic cancer // Gastrointest Endosc. – 1996. – Vol. 43, N. 6. – P. 561–567.

8. Cotton P.B. Management of malignant bile duct obstruction // J. Gastroenterol Hepatol. – 1990. – Vol. 5, Supple. 1. – P. 63–77.

9. Yasuda K. The handbook of endoscopic endosonogruphy in digestive tract. – Blackwell Science Japa К.К., 2000. – 152 p.

10. Хрусталева М.В. Современные эндоскопические транспапиллярные методы лечения механической желтухи // Анналы НЦХ РАМН. – 1997. – Вып. 6. – С. 39–42.

11. Matsuda Y., Shimakura Akamatsu T. Factors affecting the patency of stents in malignant biliary obstructions desease: univariate and multivariate analysis // Am. J. Gastroenterol. – 1991. – Vol. 86, N. 7. – P. 843– 849.

12. Tio T.L., Sie L.H., Kalimanis G., et al. Staging of ampullary and pancreatic carcinoma: comparison between endosonography and surgery // Gastrointest. Endosc. – 1996. – Vol. 44, N. 6. – P. 706–713.

13. O’Brien S., Hatfield A.R.W., Craig P.I., Williams S.P. A three year follow-up of self-expanding metal stents in the endoscopic palliation of longterm surviors with malignant biliary obstruction // Gut. – 1995. – Vol. 36, – P. 618–621.

14. Luman W., Cull A., Palmer K.R. Quality of life in patients stented for malignant biliary obstructions // Eur. J. Gastroenterol Hepatol. – 1997. – Vol. 9, N. 5. – P. 481–484.

15. Галингер Ю.И., Хрусталева М.В. Эндоскопическое лечение механической желтухи бластоматозной этиологии с использованием транспапиллярных протезов // Новые технологии в диагностике и в хирургии органов билиопанкреатодуоденальной зоны: сб. тр. междунар. конф., г. Москва, 16–17 ноября 1995. – М., 1995. – С. 148–139.

16. Isayama H., Komatsu Y., Tsujino T., et al. A prospective randomised stady of “covered” versus “uncovered” diamond steents for the management of distal malignant biliary obstruction // Gut. – 2004. – Vol. 53, N. 5. – P. 729–734.

17. Sharma B.C., Kumar R., Agarwal N., Sarin S.K. Endoscopic biliary drainage by nasobiliary drain or by stent placement in patients with acute cholangitis // Endoscopy. – 2005. – Vol. 37, N. 5. – P. 439–443.

18. Raju G. S., Sud R., Slfert A.A., et al. Biliary drainage by using stents without a central lumen: a pilot study // Gastrointest. Endosc. – 2006. – Vol. 63, N. 2. – P. 317–320.

19. van Berkel A.M., Bruno M.J., Bergman J.J., et al. A prospective randomised stady of hydrophilic polimer-coated polyurethane versus polyethylene stents in distal malignant biliary obstruction // Endoscopy. – 2003. – Vol. 35, N. 6. – P. 478–482.

20. De Palma G.D., Pezzullo A., Rega M., et al. Unilateral placement of metallic stents for malignant hilar obstruction: a prospective study // Gastrointest Endosc. – 2003. – Vol. 58, N. 1. – P. 50–53.

21. Wiersema M.J., Sandusky D., Carr R., et al. Endosonography-guided cholangipancreatography // Gastrointest. Endosc. – 1996. – Vol. 43, N. 2. – Pt. 1. – P. 102–106.

22. Giovannini M., Moutardier V., Pesenti C. et al. Endoscopic ultrasoundguided bilioduodenal anastomosis: a new technique for biliary drainage // Endoscopy. – 2001. – Vol. 33, N. 10. – P. 898–900.

23. Itoi T., Itokawa F., Sofuni A., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy for patients with failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography // World J. Gastroenterol. – 2008. – Vol. 14, N. 39. – P. 6078–6082.

24. Iwashita T., Lee J.G., Shinoura S., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided rendezvous for biliary access after failed cannulation // Endoscopy. – 2012. – Vol. 44, N. 1. – P. 60–65.

25. Mallery S., Matlock J., Freeman M.L. EUS-guided rendezvous drainage of obstructed biliary and pancreatic ducts: report of 6 cases // Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. – 2004. – Vol. 59, N. 1. – P. 100–107.