СОВРЕМЕННОЕ СОСТОЯНИЕ И ТЕНДЕНЦИИ РАЗВИТИЯ ОРГАНИЗАЦИИ ЭКСТРЕННОЙ И НЕОТЛОЖНОЙ МЕДИЦИНСКОЙ ПОМОЩИ В ПОСТИНДУСТРИАЛЬНЫХ ОБЩЕСТВАХ

Полный текст:


Аннотация

В работе представлен сравнительный анализ состояния и принципов организации экстренной медицины Западной Европы и Соединенных Штатов, а также рассмотрен ряд актуальных проблем, стоящих перед медицинским сообществом этих стран.

Об авторах

М. Ш. Хубутия
ГБУЗ «НИИ скорой помощи им. Н.В. Склифосовского ДЗМ»
Россия


В. А. Молодов
ГБУЗ «НИИ скорой помощи им. Н.В. Склифосовского ДЗМ»
Россия
научный сотрудник лаборатории автоматизированной системы управления лечебно-диагностическим процессом


В. А. Васильев
ГБУЗ «НИИ скорой помощи им. Н.В. Склифосовского ДЗМ»
Россия


Н. А. Карасев
ГБУЗ «НИИ скорой помощи им. Н.В. Склифосовского ДЗМ»
Россия


Список литературы

1. Московская декларация Первой Глобальной министерской конференции по здоровому образу жизни и неинфекционным заболеваниям, г. Москва, 28–29 апреля 2011 г. [Электронный ресурс]. – М., 2011.- Режим доступа: https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N11/365/87/PDF/N1136587.pdf?OpenElement

2. Action Plan for the Global Strategy for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases [Электронный ресурс] / World Health Organization: 2008–2013. – 42 p. – Режим доступа: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/44009/1/9789241597418_eng.pdf

3. Pevention and control of non-communicable diseases: report of the Secretary-General [Электронный ресурс] // United Nations General Assembly, Sixty-sixth session 19 may 2011. – A/66/83. – Режим доступа: http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/66/83&Lang=E

4. Risko N., Calvello E., de Ramirez S., et al. Including emergency and acute care as a global health priority // Int. J. Emerg. Med. – 2011. – Vol. 4. – P. 75.

5. Emergency Medical Treatment & Labor Act (EMTALA) [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-andGuidance/Legislation/EMTALA/

6. Tupesis J., Babcock C., Char D., et al. Optimizing global health experiences in emergency medicine residency programs: a consensus statement from the Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors 2011 Academic Assembly global health specialty track // Int. J. Emerg. Med. – 2012. – Vol. 5, N. 1. – P. 43.

7. Beran D., Avegno J. Experience with the core curricular elements for international emergency medicine fellowships // Int. J. Emerg. Med. – 2013. – Vol. 6, N. 1. – P. 10.

8. Policy Statement on Emergency Medicine in Europe [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: http://www.eusem.org/policystatement/

9. Алимов Р.Р., Парфенов В.Е., Багненко С.Ф. и др. Интенсификация использования ресурсов многопрофильного стационара за счет внедрения технологии стационарного отделения скорой медицинской помощи // Скорая медицинская помощь. – 2013. – № 4. – С. 76–82.

10. Bagnenko S., Miroshnichenko A., Alimov R., et al. Hospital-based emergency care in the Russian Federation: a historical analysis of statutory regulations // Emerg. Care J. – 2015. – Vol. 11, N. 1 – P. 4920.

11. Rodigin A. An update on emergency care and emergency medicine in Russia // Int. J. Emerg. Med. – 2015. – Vol. 8, N. 1. – Р. 42.

12. Pencheon D. Making health care more sustainable: the case of the English NHS // Public Health. – 2015. – Vol. 129, N. 10. – P. 1335–1343.

13. Hospital Episode Statistics: Accident and Emergency Attendances in England 2014-2015 [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: http://www.hscic.gov.uk/catalogue/PUB19883/acci-emer-atte-eng-2014-15-rep.pdf

14. Bywaters P., McLeod E., Fisher J., et al. Good intentions, increased inequities: developing social care services in Emergency Departments in the UK // Health Soc. Care Community. – 2011. – Vol. 19, N. 5. – Р. 460–467.

15. Khangura J., Flodgren G., Perera R., et al. Primary care professionals providing non-urgent care in hospital emergency departments // Cochrane Database Syst Rev. – 2012. – N. 11. – :CD002097.

16. Fleischmann T. Schnittstelle Zentrale Notaufnahme // Dtsch med Wochenschr. – 2016. – Vol. 141, N. 1. – Р. 19–23.

17. Bey T. Schnittstelle Zentrale Notaufnahme. Entwicklung der Emergency Medicine in den USA, Bedeutung der Emergency Departments fur das amerikanische Gesundheitssystem sowie Entwicklung der Zentralen Notaufnahmen in Deutschland // Notfall Rettungsmed. – 2007. – Vol. 10, N. 5. – P. 323–324.

18. Bey T., Hahn S., Moecke H. The current state of hospital-based emergency medicine in Germany // Int. J. Emerg. Med. – 2008. – Vol. 1, N. 4. – P. 273–277.

19. Fleischmann T. Facharzt für Notfallmedizin: Unverzichtbar auch für Deutschland // Notfall Intensivmed. – 2007. – Vol. 1. – P. 22.

20. Korzilius H. Hausarztemangel in Deutschland: Die grosse Landflucht // Dtsch Aerztebl. – 2008. – Vol. 105. – P. 373–374.

21. Hohenstein C., Hempel D., Schultheis K., et al. Critical incident reporting in emergency medicine: results of the prehospital reports // Emerg. Med. J. 2014. – Vol. 31, N. 5. – P. 415–418.

22. Dick W. Anglo-American vs. Franco-German emergency medical services system // Prehosp. Disaster Med. – 2003. – Vol. 18, N. 1. – Р. 29–35.

23. Braun F. Organisation de la médecine d’urgence en France // La Revue du Praticien. – 2015. – Vol. 1. – P. 34–36; 39–40.

24. C. van der Linden, Reijnen R., Derlet R., et al. Emergency department crowding in Netherlands: managers’ experiences // Int. J. Emerg. Med. – 2013. – Vol. 6, N. 1. – P. 41.

25. Sanchez B., Hirzel A., Bingisser R., et al. State of Emergency Medicine in Switzerland: a national profile of emergency departments in 2006 // Int. J. Emerg. Med. – 2013. – Vol. 6, N. 1. – P. 41.

26. Bergs J., Heerinckx P., Verelst S. Knowing what to expect, forecasting monthly emergency department visits: A time-series analysis // Int. Emerg. Nurs. – 2014. – Vol. 22, N. 2. – P. 112–115.

27. Donnan P., Dorward D., Mutch B., Morris A. Development and validation of a model for predicting emergency admissions over the next year (PEONY): a UK historical cohort study // Arch. Intern. Med. – 2008. – Vol. 168, N. 13. – P. 1416–1422.

28. Jones K., Paxton H., Hagtvedt R., Etchason J. An analysis of the New York University Emergency Department Algorithm’s suitability for use in gauging changes in ED usage patterns // Med. Care. – 2013. – Vol. 51, N. 7. – P. 41–50.

29. Grouse A., Bishop R., Bannon A. The Manchester Triage System provides good reliability in an Australian emergency department // Emerg. Med. J. – 2009. – Vol. 26, N. 7. – P. 484–486.

30. Schuetz P., Hausfater P., Amin D., et al. Optimizing triage and hospitalization in adult general medical emergency patients: the triage project // BMC Emerg. Med. – 2013. – Vol. 13, N. 1. – P. 12.

31. Engebretsen S., Røise O., Ribu L. Triage in Norwegian emergency departments // Tidsskr. Nor. Laegeforen. – 2013. – Vol. 133, N. 3. – P. 285–289.

32. Göransson K., Ehrenberg A., Ehnfors M. A national survey of emergency department triage in Sweden // AMIA Annu. Symp. Proc. – 2003. – Vol. 2003. – P. 851.

33. Göransson K., Ehrenberg A., Ehnfors M. Triage in emergency departments: national survey // J. Clin. Nurs. – 2005. – Vol. 14, N. 9. – P. 1067–1074.

34. Lindberg S., Lerche la Cour J., Folkestad L., et al. The use of triage in Danish emergency departments // Dan. Med. Bull. – 2011. – Vol. 58, N. 10. – P. A4301.

35. Blom M., Jonsson F., Landin-Olsson M., Ivarsson K. The probability of patients being admitted from the emergency department is negatively correlated to in-hospital bed occupancy — a registry study // Int. J. Emerg. Med. – 2014. – Vol. 7, N. 1. – P. 8.

36. Hartman M., Martin A., Benson J., Catlin A. National health spending in 2011: overall growth remains low, but some payers and services show signs of acceleration // Health Aff. (Millwood). – 2013. – Vol. 32, N. 1. – P. 87–99.

37. Machlin S. Expenses for a hospital emergency room visit, 2003. Medical Expenditure Panel Survey: Statistical Brief 111 [Electronic recourch]. – Режим доступа: http://meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/data_files/publications/st111/stat111.pdf.

38. Agency for Healthcare Services and Research. Emergency Room services: mean and median expenses per person with expense and distribution of expenses by source of payment: United States, 2011. Medical Expenditure Panel Survey [Electronic recourch]. – Режим доступа: http://meps.ahrq.gov/data_stats/tables_compendia_hh_interactive.jsp?_SERVICE=MEPSSocket0&_PROGRAM=MEPSPGM.TC.SAS&File=HCFY2011&Table=HCFY2011_PLEXP_E&VAR1=AGE&VAR2=SEX&VAR3=RACETH5C&VAR4=INSURCOV&VAR5=POVCAT11&VAR6=MSA&VAR7=REGION&VAR8=HEALTH&VARO1=4+17+44+64&VARO2=1&VARO3=1&VARO4=1&VARO5=1&VARO6=1&VARO7=1&VARO8=1&_Debug

39. Munjal K., Silverman R., Freese J., et al. Utilization of emergency medical services in a large urban area: description of call types and temporal trends // Prehosp. Emerg. Care. – 2011. – Vol. 15, N. 3. – P. 371–380.

40. Lee M., Schuur J., Zink B. Owning the cost of emergency medicine: beyond 2% // Ann. Emerg. Med. – 2013. – Vol. 62, N. 5. – P. 498–505.

41. Berwick D., Hackbarth A. Eliminating waste in US health care // JAMA. – 2012. – Vol. 307, N. 14. – P. 1513–1516.

42. Schuur J., Carney D., Lyn E., et al. A Top-Five List for Emergency Medicine. A Pilot Project to Improve the Value of Emergency Care // JAMA Intern Med. – 2014. – Vol. 174, N. 4. – P. 509–515.

43. Prentice J., Pizer S. Delayed access to health care and mortality // Health Serv. Res. – 2007. – Vol. 42, N. 2. – P. 644–662.

44. Rust G., Ye J., Baltrus P., et al. Practical barriers to timely primary care access: impact on adult use of emergency department services // Arch. Intern. Med. – 2008. – Vol. 168, N. 15. – P. 1705–1710.

45. Rose K., Ross J., Horwitz L. Advanced Access Scheduling Outcomes. A Systematic Review // Arch. Intern. Med. – 2011. – Vol. 171, N. 13. – P. 1150–1159.

46. Lowthian J., Curtis A., Cameron P., et al. Systematic review of trends in emergency department attendances: an Australian perspective // Emerg. Med. J. – 2011. – Vol. 28, N. 5. – P. 373–377.


Дополнительные файлы

Для цитирования: Хубутия М.Ш., Молодов В.А., Васильев В.А., Карасев Н.А. СОВРЕМЕННОЕ СОСТОЯНИЕ И ТЕНДЕНЦИИ РАЗВИТИЯ ОРГАНИЗАЦИИ ЭКСТРЕННОЙ И НЕОТЛОЖНОЙ МЕДИЦИНСКОЙ ПОМОЩИ В ПОСТИНДУСТРИАЛЬНЫХ ОБЩЕСТВАХ. Журнал им. Н.В. Склифосовского «Неотложная медицинская помощь». 2016;(4):15-20.

For citation: Khubutiya M.S., Molodov V.A., Vasilyev V.A., Karasev N.A. THE CURRENT STATE AND DEVELOPMENT TRENDS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE MANAGEMENT IN POSTINDUSTRIAL SOCIETIES. Russian Sklifosovsky Journal "Emergency Medical Care". 2016;(4):15-20. (In Russ.)

Просмотров: 205

Обратные ссылки

  • Обратные ссылки не определены.


Creative Commons License
Контент доступен под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2223-9022 (Print)
ISSN 2541-8017 (Online)