CURRENT APPROACHES TO THE PREVENTION, EVALUATION AND TREATMENT OF COMPLICATIONS DURING ENDOVASCULAR CORONARY ARTERY INTERVENTIONS. PART I. CORONARY ARTERY RUPTURES
Abstract
AIM OF THE STUDY. The aim of the study was to investigate the incidence, causes, predictors, forms of coronary artery ruptures during endovascular interventions, and to present current approaches to rupture treatment.
MATERIAL AND METHODS. The results of endovascular procedures performed in 2317 patients from January 2010 to March 2013 were reviewed. Coronary artery ruptures occurred in 5 patients (0.22%).
RESULTS. A coronary artery rupture was classified by Ellis criteria as type II in 1 patient and as type III in 4 patients. The vessel wall was perforated with a hydrophilic guidewire in one patient. A rupture occurred during balloon dilatation in 2 patients, and at postdilatation after stent implantation in 2 other patients. The complications were treated using the following techniques: a prolonged balloon inflation, implantation of stent-grafts, embolization. These approaches proved to be effective in 4 of 5 cases, in 1 case a repeated rupture during the stent-graft implantation resulted in a fatal outcome.
CONCLUSIONS. The treatment techniques for coronary artery ruptures may be different and the choice should be based on the cause and the form of rupture. Successful treatment of this complication is feasible.
About the Author
S. A. Prozorov
Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Ajluni S.C., Glazier S., Blankenship L., et al. Perforations after percutaneous coronary interventions: clinical, angiographic, and therapeutic observations // Cathet. Cardivasc. Diagn. – 1994. – Vol. 32, N. 3. – Р. 206– 212.
2. Ellis S.G., Ajluni S., Arnold A.Z., et al. Increased coronary perforation in the new device era. Incidence, classification, management and outcome // Circulation. – 1994. – Vol. 90, N. 6. – P. 2725–2730.
3. Fukutomi T., Suzuki T., Popma J.J., et al. Early and late clinical outcomes following coronary perforation in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention // Circ. J. – 2002. – Vol. 66, N. 4. – P. 349–356.
4. Fasseas P., Orford J.L., Panetta C.J., et al. Incidence, correlates, management, and clinical outcome of coronary perforation: Analysis of 16,298 procedures // Am. Heart J. – 2004. – Vol. 147, N. 1 – P. 140–145.
5. Witzke C.F., Martin-Herrero F., Clarke S.C., et al. The changing pattern of coronary perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention in the new device era // J. Invasive Cardiol. – 2004. – Vol. 16, N. 6. – P. 257– 301.
6. Ramana R.K., Arab D., Joyal D., et al. Coronary artery perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention: incidence and outcomes in the new interventional era // J. Invasive Cardiol. – 2005. – Vol. 17, N. 11. – P. 603–605.
7. Javaid A., Buch A.N., Satler L.F., et al. Management and outcomes of coronary artery perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention // Am. J. Cardiol. –2006. – Vol. 98, N. 4. – P. 911–914.
8. Shirakabe A., Takano H., Nakamura S., et al. Coronary perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention // Int. Heart J. – 2007. – Vol. 48, N. 1. – P. 1–9.
9. Doll J.A., Nikolsky E., Stone G.W., et al. Outcomes of patients with coronary artery perforation complicating percutaneous coronary intervention and correlations with the type of adjunctive antithrombotic therapy: Pooled analysis from REPLACE-2, ACUITY, and HORIZONSAMI trials // J. Interv. Cardiol. – 2009. – Vol. 22. – P. 453–459.
10. Kiernan T.J., Yan B.P., Ruggiero N., et al. Coronary artery perforations in the contemporary interventional era // J. Interv. Cardiol. – 2009. – Vol. 22, N. 4. – P. 350–353.
11. Ben-Gal Y., Weisz G., Collins M.B., et al. Dual catheter technique for the treatment of severe coronary artery perforations // Catheter Cardiovasc. Interv. – 2010. – Vol. 75, N. 5. – P. 708–712.
12. Teis A., Fernández-Nofrerías E., Rodríguez-Leor O., et al. Coronary artery perforation by intracoronary guide wires: Risk factors and clinical outcomes // Rev. Esp. Cardiol. – 2010. – Vol. 63, N. 6. – P. 730–734.
13. Al-Lamee R., Ielasi A., Latib A., et al. Incidence, predictors, management, immediate and long-term outcomes following grade III coronary perforation // JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. – 2011. – Vol. 4, N. 1. – P. 87–95.
14. Copeland K.A., Hopkins J.T., Weintraub W.S., Rahman E. Long-term follow-up of polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stents implanted during percutaneous coronary intervention for management of acute coronary perforation // Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. – 2012. – Vol. 80, N. 1. – P. 53–57.
15. Hendry C., Fraser D., Eichhofer J., et al. Coronary perforation in the drugeluting stent era: incidence, risk factors, management and outcome: the UK experience // Eurointervention. – 2012. – Vol. 8, N. 1. – P. 79– 86.
16. Shimony A., Zahger D., Van Straten M., et al. Incidence, risk factors, management and outcomes of coronary artery perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention // Am. J. Cardiol. – 2009. – Vol. 104, N. 12. – P. 1674–1677.
17. Maruo T., Yasuda S., Miyazaki S. Delayed appearance of coronary artery perforation following cutting balloon angioplasty // Catheter Cardiovasc. Interv. – 2002. – Vol. 57, N. 4. – P. 529–531.
18. Al-Mukhaini M., Panduranga P., Sulaiman K., et al. Coronary perforation and covered stents: an update and review // Heart Views. – 2011. – Vol. 12, N. 2. – P. 63–70.
19. Karabulut A., Topçu K. Coronary perforation due to sirolimus-eluting stent’s strut rupture with post-dilatation // Kardiol. Pol. – 2011. – Vol. 69, N. 2. – P. 183–186.
20. Lansky A.J., Yang Y.M., Khan Y., et al. Treatment of coronary artery perforations complicating percutaneous coronary intervention with a polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent graft // Am. J. Cardiol. – 2006. – Vol. 98, N. 3. – P. 370–374.
21. Briguori C., Nishida T., Anzuini A., et al. Emergency polytetrafluoethylene-covered stent implantation to treat coronary ruptures // Circulation. – 2000. – Vol. 102, N. 25. – P. 3028–3031.
22. Kaluski E., Gerula C., Randhawa P., et al. Massive coronary perforation and shock: From appropriate labeling to appropriate calls // Acute Card. Care. – 2009. – Vol. 11, N. 3. – P. 181–186.
23. Aleong G., Jimenez-Quevedo P., Alfonso F. Collagen embolization for the successful treatment of a distal coronary artery perforation // Catheter Cardiovasc. Interv. – 2009. – Vol. 73, N. 3. – P. 332–335.
24. Goel P.K. Delayed and repeated cardiac tamponade following microleak in RCA successfully treated with intra arterial sterile glue injection // Catheter Cardiovasc. Interv. – 2009. – Vol. 73, N. 6. – P. 797–800.
25. Jamali A.H., Lee M.S., Makkar R.R. Coronary perforation after percutaneous coronary intervention successfully treated with local thrombin injection // J. Invasive Cardiol. – 2006. – Vol. 18, N. 4. –P. E143–145.
26. Kawano H., Arakawa S., Satoh O., et al. Foreign body granulomatous change from absorbable gelatin sponge and microcoil embolization after a guide wire-induced perforation in the distal coronary artery // Intern. Med. – 2010. – Vol. 49, N. 17. – P. 1871–1874.
27. Pershad A., Yarkoni A., Biglari D. Management of distal coronary perforations // J. Invasive Cardiol. – 2008. – Vol. 20, N. 6. – P. E187–191.
28. Störger H., Ruef J. Closure of guide wire-induced coronary artery perforation with a two-component fibrin glue // Catheter Cardiovasc. Interv. – 2007. – Vol. 70, N. 2. – P. 237–240.
29. Tanaka S., Nishigaki K., Ojio S., et al. Transcatheter embolization by autologous blood clot is useful management for small side branch perforation due to percutaneous coronary intervention guide wire // J. Cardiol. – 2008. – Vol. 52, N. 3. – P. 285–289.
30. To A.C., El-Jack S.S., Webster M.W., Stewart J.T. Coronary artery perforation successfully treated with tris-acryl gelatin microsphere embolisation // Heart Lung Circ. – 2008. – Vol. 17, N. 5. – P. 423–426.
31. Trehan V.K., Nigam A. Cyanoacrylate glue for type III lad perforation // Indian Heart J. – 2008. – Vol. 60, N. 6. – P. 612–614.
32. Gercken U., Lansky A.J., Buellesfeld L., et al. Results of the Jostent coronary stent graft implantation in various clinical settings: Procedural and follow-up results // Catheter Cardiovasc. Interv. – 2002. – Vol. 56. – P. 353–360.
33. Ly H., Awaida J.P., Lesperance J., Bilodeau L. Angiographic and clinical outcomes of polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent use in significant coronary perforations // Am. J. Card. – 2005. – Vol. 95, N. 2. – P. 244–246.
Review
For citations:
Prozorov S.A. CURRENT APPROACHES TO THE PREVENTION, EVALUATION AND TREATMENT OF COMPLICATIONS DURING ENDOVASCULAR CORONARY ARTERY INTERVENTIONS. PART I. CORONARY ARTERY RUPTURES. Russian Sklifosovsky Journal "Emergency Medical Care". 2014;(2):26-31. (In Russ.)
Views:
648
Email this article 