Experience of extended transtriceps approach in osteosynthesis of complex fractures of the distal metaepiphysis of the humerus
https://doi.org/10.23934/2223-9022-2021-10-4-687-694
Abstract
Background. The preferred treatment for intra-articular displaced fractures is open reduction and internal fixation. The need to obtain a better visualization of the fracture geometry made it necessary to develop a large number of new approaches and their modifications.
Material and methods. The study included 186 patients with an intra-articular fracture of the distal humerus, who underwent plate osteosynthesis using the standard technique. The main group included 112 patients who were operated on using ETTA. The comparison group included 74 patients with a similar type of fracture, who were operated on using chevron olecranon osteotomy. The groups were comparable in terms of age, gender, mechanism of injury, and nature of the fracture. Long-term results were evaluated in 186 patients (minimum follow-up period – 12 months).
Results. Comparative analysis revealed that the time of surgery was reduced by an average of 20 minutes (p=0.03) in the main group. The immediate and medium-term results were assessed according to the data of physical examinations, control radiography, dynamics of the increase in the amplitude of motion in the elbow joint. The results were comparable. When assessing complications, the migration of fixators was detected in 5.5% in the main group and 16% in the comparison group. In the comparison group, failure of union of the olecranon after osteotomy, migration of wires with skin perforation, and reactive bursitis were observed.
Conclusion. 1. The extended transtriceps approach provides good visualization for fixing fractures of the distal humerus. 2. Evaluation of treatment results confirms that osteosynthesis using this access allows to reduce the time and trauma of the operation, to avoid complications associated with osteotomy of the olecranon, and to carry out successful postoperative rehabilitation, achieving good functional results.
About the Authors
A. Yu. SergyeevRussian Federation
Researcher Department of Emergency Trauma of the Musculoskeletal System,
3 B. Sukharevskaya square, Moscow, 129090
A. M. Fain
Russian Federation
Head of the Department of Emergency Trauma of the Musculoskeletal System,
3 B. Sukharevskaya square, Moscow, 129090
A. Yu. Vasa
Russian Federation
Candidate of Medical Sciences, Leading Researcher, Department of Emergency Trauma of the Musculoskeletal System,
3 B. Sukharevskaya square, Moscow, 129090
S. F. Gnetetsky
Russian Federation
Doctor of Medical Sciences, Leading Researcher Department of Emergency Trauma of the Musculoskeletal System,
3 B. Sukharevskaya square, Moscow, 129090
V. B. Bondarev
Russian Federation
Researcher Department of Emergency Trauma of the Musculoskeletal System,
3 B. Sukharevskaya square, Moscow, 129090
References
1. Zhabin GI, Shakhizi FAl, Fedyunina SYu. Oskol’chatye perelomy myshchelka plecha u vzroslykh (klassifikatsiya i pokazaniya k vyboru fiksatora). Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. 2003;(1):38–41. (in Russ)
2. Zorya VI, Babovnikov AV. Povrezhdeniya loktevogo sustava. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media Publ.; 2010. (in Russ)
3. Joeris A, Lutz N, Blumenthal A, Slongo T, Audigé L. The AO Pediatric Comprehensive Classification of Long Bone Fractures (PCCF). Acta Orthop. 2017;88(2):123–128. PMID: 27882802 https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2016.1258532
4. Anglen J. Distal humerus fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005;13(5):291– 297. PMID: 16148353 https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-200509000-00001
5. Bets IH. Surgical Treatment of Fractures of the Humerus and the Biological Aspects of Osteosynthesis. Trauma. 2017;18(6):167–173. (in Russ) https://doi.org/10.22141/1608-1706.6.18.2017.121196
6. Kalantyrskaya VA, Kluchevskiy VV, Perova АА, Piscun MS. Reconstructive and Plastic surgery in the treatment of the elbow injuries. Issues of Reconstructive and Plastic Surgery. 2015;18(2):25–33. (in Russ)
7. Sanchez-Sotelo J, Torchia ME, O`Driscoll SW. Complex distal humeral fractures: internal fixation with a principle-based parallel-plate technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(5):961–969. PMID: 17473132 https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.E.01311
8. Flinkkilä T, Toimela J, Sirniö K, Leppilahti J. Results of parallel plate fixation of comminuted intra-articular distal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014;23(5):701–707. PMID: 24745319 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2014.01.017
9. Sarkhel S, Bhattacharyya S, Mukherjee S. Condylar orientation plating in comminuted intraarticular fractures of adult distal humerus. Indian J Orthop. 2015;49(5):523–528. PMID: 26538758 https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.164046
10. Shesternya NА, Lazarev АF, Ivannikov SV, Zharova ТА, Solod EI, Dzhanibekov MH. Subcutaneous-Subfascial Osteosynthesis of Fractures of the Distal Humerus. The Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics. 2017;1(21):5–9. (in Russ)
11. Zhabin GI, Shakhizi F, Fedyunina SY. Surgical Treatment in Comminuted Humerus Condyle Fractures of С Type by AO/ASIF Classification. N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Orthopedics. 2003;10(3):53–56. https://doi.org/10.17816/vto200310353-56
12. Weber BG, Vasey H. Osteosynthesis in olecranon Fractures. Z Unfallmed Berufskr. 1963;56:90–96. PMID: 14049893
13. Buijze GA, Blankevoort L, Tuijthof GJ, Sierevelt IN, Kloen P. Biomechanical evaluation of fixation of comminuted olecranon fractures: one-third tubular versus locking compression plating. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010;130(4):459–464. PMID: 19823857 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-009-0980-z
14. Horne JG, Tanzer TL. Olecranon fractures: a review of 100 cases. J Trauma. 1981; 21(6):469–472. PMID: 7230301
15. Gainor BJ, Moussa F, Schott T. Healing rate of transverse osteotomies of the olecranon used in reconstruction of distal humerus fractures. J South Orthop Assoc.1995;4(4):263–268 PMID: 8925380
16. Atalar AS, Demirhan M, Salduz A, Kilicoglu O, Seyahi A. Functional results of the parallel-plate technique for complex distal humerus fractures. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2009;43(1):21–27. PMID: 19293612 https://doi.org/10.3944/AOTT.2009.021
17. Atalar AC, Tunalı O, Erşen A, Kapıcıoğlu M, Sağlam Y, Demirhan MS. Biomechanical comparison of orthogonal versus parallel double plating systems in intraarticular distal humerus fractures. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2017;51(1):23–28. PMID: 27965047 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aott.2016.11.001
18. Parmaksızoğlu AS, Özkaya U, Bilgili F, Mutlu H, Çetin Ü. Fixation of extra-articular distal humeral fractures with a lateral apporoach and a locked plate: an alternative method. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2016;50(2):132–138. PMID: 26969946 https://doi.org/10.3944/AOTT.2015.14.0445
19. O`Driscoll SW. Optimising stability in distal humeral fracture fixation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005;14(1 Suppl S):186S–195S. PMID: 15726080 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2004.09.033
20. Fuller DA. Open Reduction, Internal Fixation Distal Intraarticular Distal Humerus Fracture. J Orthop Trauma. 2016;30(Suppl 2):S13–S14. PMID: 27441924 https://doi.org/10.1097//BOT.0000000000000584
21. McKee MD, Veillette CJ, Hall JA, Schemitsch EH, Wild LM, McCormack R, et al. A multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial of open reduction-internal fixation versus total elbow arthroplasty for displaced intraarticular distal humeral fractures in elderly patients. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18(1):3–12. PMID: 18823799 https://doi.org/101016/j.jse.2008.06.005
22. Mansat P. Les raideurs du coupe. Paris: Sauramps Medical; 2005. 23. Zwingmann J, Neumann MV, Hammer TO, Reising K, Südkamp NP. Comminuted Fracture of Elbow – Ostheosynthesis vs. Total Joint Replacement. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2016;83(4):231–237. PMID: 28026723
Review
For citations:
Sergyeev A.Yu., Fain A.M., Vasa A.Yu., Gnetetsky S.F., Bondarev V.B. Experience of extended transtriceps approach in osteosynthesis of complex fractures of the distal metaepiphysis of the humerus. Russian Sklifosovsky Journal "Emergency Medical Care". 2021;10(4):687-694. https://doi.org/10.23934/2223-9022-2021-10-4-687-694