Experience of Using Hyperbaric Oxygenation in the Treatment of Radionecrosis That Developed as a Complication of Stereotactic Radiosurgical Treatment of Meningioma on the Example of a Clinical Case
https://doi.org/10.23934/2223-9022-2020-9-4-670-676
Abstract
In contrast to conventional microsurgery, stereotactic radiosurgery has an advantage in the treatment of intracranial masses, avoiding severe complications associated with open surgery. In rare cases, the use of the method is associated with the development of radiation-induced injuries, one of which is radiation necrosis (RN). This is a late complication of radiosurgery, developing mainly 6 months after radiation exposure. The neurological manifestations of this complication depend on location, and the clinical picture is very diverse. The method of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with intravenous contrast enhancement is quite often the first link in neuroimaging, which helps to suggest the presence of this complication based on the X-ray picture and to clarify the location of changes.
We presented the experience of radiation necrosis treatment in a 47-year-old patient who was referred to our department with a diagnosis of frontal meningioma. The patient underwent stereotactic radiosurgical treatment using the Elekta Leksell Gamma Knife Perfextion device, and 6 months later the gradual deterioration began, the patient complained of headache, nausea; central prosoparesis developed. Considering the clinical picture and control MRI data, the changes were interpreted as radionecrosis. In order to control the complication, the patient underwent standard glucocroticosteroid therapy, supplemented by hyperbaric oxygenation (HBO), which made it possible to achieve regression of the adverse clinical and radiological manifestations of the complication. Thus, on a clinical example, it was demonstrated that the combined use of glucocorticosteroids and HBOs is highly effective in the treatment of RN.
About the Authors
A. S. TokarevRussian Federation
Aleksey S. Tokarev Candidate of Medical Sciences, neurosurgeon of the Center for Radiosurgery
3 B. Suharevskaya Sq., Moscow 129090, Russian Federation
V. N. Stepanov
Russian Federation
Valentin N. Stepanov Radiologist
3 B. Suharevskaya Sq., Moscow 129090, Russian Federation
V. A. Rak
Russian Federation
Vyacheslav A. Rak Neurosurgeon
3 B. Suharevskaya Sq., Moscow 129090, Russian Federation
O. L. Yevdokimova
Russian Federation
Olga L. Yevdokimova Doctor-radiologist of the highest category, Head
3 B. Suharevskaya Sq., Moscow 129090, Russian Federation
I. A. Terekhin
Russian Federation
Ivan A. Terekhin Radiologist
3 B. Suharevskaya Sq., Moscow 129090, Russian Federation
M. V. Neznanova
Russian Federation
Maria V. Neznanova Radiologist
3 B. Suharevskaya Sq., Moscow 129090, Russian Federation
O. A. Levina
Russian Federation
Olga A. Levina Leading Researcher, Department of Emergency Neurosurgery
3 B. Suharevskaya Sq., Moscow 129090, Russian Federation
References
1. Whittle IR, Smith C, Navoo P, Collie D. Meningiomas. Lancet.2004;363(9420):1535–1543. PMID: 15135603 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16153-9
2. Walker AJ, Ruzevick J, Malayeri AA, Rigamonti D, Lim M, Redmond KJ, et al. Postradiation imaging changes in the CNS: How can we differentiate between treatment effect and disease progression? Future Oncol. 2014;10(7):1277–1297. PMID: 24947265 https://doi.org/10.2217/fon.13.271
3. Webster JG. (ed.) Medical Devices and Instrumentation. Encyclopedia of medical devices and instrumentation. 7nd ed. Vol. 4. Canada: Wiley &Sons; 2006.
4. Nikitin K.V. Lokal’nye luchevye povrezhdeniya golovnogo mozga posle radioterapii i radiokhirurgii intrakranial’nykh ob”emnykh obrazovaniy: Dr. Med. Sci. Diss. Synopsis. Moscow: NII neyrokhirurgii im akad NN Burdenko RAMN Publ.; 2010. (In Russ.) Available at: http://medicaldiss.
5. com/docreader/317814/a#?page=1 [Accessed 30 Oct, 2020]
6. Packer RJ, Zimmerman RA, Bilaniuk LT. Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of treatment – related central nervous system damage. Cancer. 1986;58(3):635–640. PMID: 3731021. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19860801)58:3<635::aidcncr2820580307>3.0.co;2-x
7. Bora U, Hakan G, Ferrat D, Selcuk D, Murat B. Hyperbaric Oxygen in the Treatment of Radiation Proctitis and Cerebral Necrosis. Canc Therapy & Oncol Int J. 2017;7(4):555720. https://doi.org/10.19080/ctoij.2017.07.555720
8. Wanebo JE. Kidd GA, King MC, Chung TS. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for treatment of adverse radiation effects after stereotactic radiosurgery of arteriovenous malformations: case report and review of literature. Surg Neurol. 2009; 72(2):162–167. PMID: 18786715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surneu.2008.03.037
9. Jones MW, Wyatt HA. Hyperbaric, Physics. StatPearls [Internet]. 2019. PMID: 28846268. Available at: https://www.statpearls.com/sp/ms/185/23143/ [Accessed 10 Nov, 2020]
10. Lam G, Fontaine R, Ross FL, Chiu ES. Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy: Exploring the Clinical Evidence. Adv Ski Wound Care J. 2017;30(4):181–190. PMID:28301358 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.asw.0000513089.75457.22
11. Stępień K, Ostrowski RP, Matyja E. Hyperbaric oxygen as an adjunctive therapy in treatment of malignancies, including brain tumours. Med Oncol. 2016;33(9):1–9. PMID: 27485098. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-016-0814-0
12. Rahmathulla G, Marko NF, Weil RJ. Cerebral radiation necrosis: A review of the pathobiology, diagnosis and management considerations. J Clin Neurosci. 2013;20(4):485–502. PMID: 23416129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2012.09.011
13. Levina OA, Romasenko MV, Krylov VV, Petrikov SS, Goldin MM, Evseev AK. Hyperbaric Oxygenation Therapy at Acute Cerebral Diseases and Brain Damages. The New Opportunities and New Solutions. The Russian Journal of Neurosurgery. 2014;(4):9–15. (In Russ.)
14. Levina OA, Grushina TI. Giperbaricheskaya oksigenatsiya v onkoreabilitatsii. In: Fizioterapiya. Lechebnaya fizkul’tura. Reabilitatsiya. Sportivnaya meditsina. Materialy II Mezhdunar. kongr. (Moskva, 24–25 oktyabrya 2016 g.). Moscow; 2016: 55. (In Russ.) Available at: http://medrehabilitation.dnmu.ru/media/uploads/2016/12/05/med_rehab_2_mezhd_kongr_fzt_lfk_mr__sm_tezisbook_24-251016.pdf [Accessed 30 Oct, 2020]
15. Aleschenko EI, Romasenko MV, Petrikov SS, Levina OA, Krylov VV. Hyperbaric Oxygenation Influence on Intracranial Pressure in Patents With Intracranial Hemorrhage Receiving Mechanical Ventilation. Russian Journal of Anаеsthesiology and Reanimatology. 2011;(4):55–58. (In Russ.)
16. Levina OA, Krylov VV. Giperbaricheskaya oksigenatsiya pri ostroy patologii golovnogo mozga. In: Krylov VV. (ed.) Neyrokhirurgiya i neyroreanimatologiya. Moscow; 2018.660–676. (In Russ.)
17. Craighead P, Shea–Budgell MA, Nation J, Esmail R, Evans AW, Parliament M, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for late radiation tissue injury in gynecologic malignancies. Curr Oncol. 2011;18(5):220–227. PMID: 21980249. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.v18i5.767
18. Buboltz JB, Tadi P. Hyperbaric Treatment Of Brain Radiation Necrosis. StatPearls [Internet]. 2019;4. PMID: 28613737 Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK431083/ [Accessed 10 Nov, 2020]
19. Yoritsune E, Furuse M, Kuwabara H, Miyata T, Nonoguchi N, Kawabata S, et al. Inflammation as well as angiogenesis may participate in the pathophysiology of brain radiation necrosis. J Radiat Res. 2014;55(4):803–811. PMID: 24676944. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rru017
20. Kohshi K, Imada H, Nomoto S, Yamaguchi R, Abe H, Yamamoto H. Successful treatment of radiation-induced brain necrosis by hyperbaric oxygen therapy. J Neurol Sci. 2003;209(1–2):115–117. PMID: 12686413. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-510x(03)00007-8
Review
For citations:
Tokarev A.S., Stepanov V.N., Rak V.A., Yevdokimova O.L., Terekhin I.A., Neznanova M.V., Levina O.A. Experience of Using Hyperbaric Oxygenation in the Treatment of Radionecrosis That Developed as a Complication of Stereotactic Radiosurgical Treatment of Meningioma on the Example of a Clinical Case. Russian Sklifosovsky Journal "Emergency Medical Care". 2020;9(4):670-676. https://doi.org/10.23934/2223-9022-2020-9-4-670-676