PRIMARY SHOULDER-JOINT ARTHROPLASTY IN PATIENTS WITH SEVERE INJURIES OF PROXIMAL HUMERUS
https://doi.org/10.23934/2223-9022-2017-6-2-154-157
Abstract
Introduction. Lesions of proximal humerus occur often nowadays. Many surgical methods are performed in such situations.
Material and Methods. In October 2014 — August 2016, 25 patients with severe lesions of proximal humerus underwent primary unipolar shoulder joint arthroplasty in the Trauma Department no. 2 of S. Yudin City Clinical Hospital. AO\ASIF classification was used. The results were evaluated in the period from 5 to 18 months by Swanson shoulder score. The result 20-30 points was assessed as excellent, 10–19 points — fair, less than 10 points — poor.
Objectives. To evaluate immediate and midterm results of the unipolar shoulder joint arthroplasty in severe injuries of the proximal humerus.
Results. Good results were received in 19 cases (76%), fair results were achieved in 6 (24%) cases and there were no poor results. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications.
Discussion. It is preferable to perform hemiarthroplasty if glenoid surface is intact. In such cases the results are similar to total arthroplasty. Standard surgical technics were used in all patients. All of them underwent rehabilitation courses after the surgery and returned to daily life and work.
Conclusion: Primary shoulder joint arthroplasty may be considered as a method of choice for severe fractures and fractures with dislocation of head and surgical neck of humerus.
About the Authors
M. O. Radzhabov
S. Yudin City Clinical Hospital of the Moscow Health Department
Russian Federation
Moscow
Russian Federation
Moscow
M. M. Alexanyan
S. Yudin City Clinical Hospital of the Moscow Health Department
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
traumatologist and orthopedist of the Trauma Department no. 2,
Moscow
V. M. Kochemasov
S. Yudin City Clinical Hospital of the Moscow Health Department
Russian Federation
Moscow
Russian Federation
Moscow
I. N. Nikolsky
S. Yudin City Clinical Hospital of the Moscow Health Department
Russian Federation
Moscow
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Prokhorenko V.M., Slobodskoy A.B., Chorniy S.I., et al. Primary endoprothesis of shoulder joint at heavy traumatic damages of proximal segment of a shoulder bone and their consequences. Byulleten’ VostochnoSibirskogo nauchnogo tsentra Sibirskogo otdeleniya Rossiyskoy akademii meditsinskikh nauk. 2013; 5: 80–86. (In Russian).
2. Shevtsov V.I., Volokitina E.A., Kamshilov B.V., Kaminskiy A.V. Endoprosthesis of large joints of the upper limb in the Russian scientific center “Restorative traumatology and orthopedics” named after academician G. A. Ilizarov”. In: Actual questions of surgery of the upper limb: materials of scientific-practical conference with international participation. Kurgan, May 14–15, 2009. Kurgan, 2009: 133–135. (In Russian).
3. Zarayskiy A. S., Zorya V. I. Shoulder arthroplasty. Problems and decision. Moskovskiy khirurgicheskiy zhurnal. 2011; 4: 58–64. (In Russian).
4. Chirkov N.N., Kaminskiy A.V., Pozdnyakov A.V. Midterm functional results after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2014; 3. Available at: https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=13339 (Accessed May 29 2017) (In Russian).
5. Nenashev D.V., Varfolomeev A.P., Maykov S.V. Analysis of long-term results of shoulder arthroplasty. Travmatologiya i ortopediya Rossii. 2012; 2: 71–78. DOI: 10.21823/2311-2905-2012-2-71-78. (In Russian).
6. Arkhipov S.V., Kavalerskiy G.M. Shoulder: advanced surgical technology. Moscow: Meditsina Publ., 2009: 137–156. (In Russian).
7. Adams J.E., Sperling W., Schleck C.D., et al. Outcomes of shoulder arthroplasty in Olmstead country, Minnesota: a population based study. Clin Orthop. 2007; 455: 176–182. DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000238870.99980.64.
8. Slobodskoy A. B., Badak I. S. Endoprosthetics of the shoulder. Geniy ortopedii. 2011; 4: 71–76. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Radzhabov M.O., Alexanyan M.M., Kochemasov V.M., Nikolsky I.N. PRIMARY SHOULDER-JOINT ARTHROPLASTY IN PATIENTS WITH SEVERE INJURIES OF PROXIMAL HUMERUS. Russian Sklifosovsky Journal "Emergency Medical Care". 2017;6(2):154-157. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.23934/2223-9022-2017-6-2-154-157
Views:
867
Email this article 