COMPENSATORY OPPORTUNITIES OF THE SMALL INTESTINE AFTER EXTENSIVE DISTAL AND PROXIMAL RESECTION (EXPERIMENTAL STUDY)
https://doi.org/10.23934/2223-9022-2017-6-2-104-111
Abstract
Resection of certain parts of the small intestine is common in clinical practice for various diseases and traumatic injuries. The significant decrease in bowel functioning leads to the development of a specific “short bowel syndrome” (SBS). There is an opinion that the remaining parts of the intestine after resection perform a compensatory function as a result of the development of morphological changes in the intestinal wall. Histological examination of the intestinal wall with evolved compensatory changes is of undoubted interest from the scientific and clinical point of view.
Material and Methods. To create the experimental model of SBS, 107 laboratory Wistar male rats were used, weighing 500–600 g, which underwent resection with removal of 1/2 or 2/3 of the small intestine length in proximal or distal parts. The observation period for the animals was 1, 2, 4 and 6 months. Upon expiration of indicated dates, samples of the small intestine and liver were taken from rats for autopsy to be used for histological examination. At the indicated terms, the animals had signs of SBS (diarrhea, weight loss), as well as morphological changes in the intestinal mucosa.
Results and Conclusion. According to the results of the study, we concluded that the loss of 1/2 the length of the small intestine is overcome without consequences, and the loss of 2/3 of its length, especially of its proximal part, is accompanied by a longer period of adaptation and more significant morphological alteration of the mucosa, which has to perform not only digestion, but also absorption.
About the Authors
P. A. YartsevRussian Federation
Moscow
G. P. Titova
Russian Federation
Moscow
A. V. Grishin
Russian Federation
Moscow
A. V. Vodyasov
Russian Federation
Moscow
T. G. Podlovchenko
Russian Federation
Moscow
M. N. Petukhova
Russian Federation
researcher of the Laboratory of Experimental Pathology,
Moscow
A. S. Papaninov
Russian Federation
Moscow
O. S. Kislitsyna
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Khripun A.I., Shurygin S.N, Pryamikov A.D., et al. Major intestinal resections and short-bowel syndrome in patients with the acute mesenterial thrombosis. Khirurgiya. 2012; 2: 14–18. (In Russian).
2. Ferraris R.P., Carey H.V. Intestinal transport during fasting and malnutrition. Annu Rev Nutr. 2000; 20: 195–219. PMID: 10940332. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.nutr.20.1.195.
3. Solomentseva T.A. Short bowel syndrome: tactics of the doctorgastroenterologist. Ostrye i neotlozhnye sostoyaniya v praktike vracha. 2009; 5: 50–55. (In Russian).
4. Parekh N., Seidner D., Steiger E. Managing short bowel syndrome: making the most of what the patient still has. Cleve. Clin. J. Med. 2005; 72(9): 833–888. PMID: 16193832.
5. Cagir B. Short-Bowel Syndrome. Medscape reference. 2016. Available at: http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/193391-overview (Accessed May 29, 2017).
6. Galeeva Z.M., Gimaletdinova I.A., Absalyamova L.R., et al. Short bowel syndrome in general clinic practice. Vestnik sovremennoy klinicheskoy meditsiny. 2011; 4(2): 36–43. (In Russian).
7. Pryamikov A.D., Mironov A.B., Latonov V.V., et al. Short colon syndrome and bowels transplantation. Annaly khirurgii. 2011; 3: 12–19. (In Russian).
8. O Keefe S.J.D., Buchman A.L., Fishbein T.M., et al. Short bowel syndrome and intestinal failure: consensus definition and overview. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006; 4(1): 6–10. PMID: 16431298. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2005.10.002.
9. Printz H., Schlenzka R., Requadt P., et al. Small bowel lengthening by mechanical distraction. Digestion. 1997; 58(3): 240–248. PMID: 9243119.
10. Nechaev V.M., Ivashkin T.V., Myagkova L.P. Short bowel syndrome. Rossiyskiy zhurnal gastroenterologii, gepatologii, koloproktologii. 2001; 5: 11–18. (In Russian).
11. Thompson J. S., DiBaise J.K., Iyer K.R., et al. Postoperative short bowel syndrome. J Am Coll Surg. 2005; 201(1): 85–89. PMID: 15978448. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.02.034.
12. Uen, Y.H., Liang A.I., Lee H.H., Hsu Y.H. Long-term outcome of intestinal lengthening procedure for short-bowel syndrome: A case report. Surgery. 1999; 125(1): 117–120. PMID: 9889808.
13. Buchman A.L. Etiology and initial management of short bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2006; 130(2 Suppl 1): S5–S15. PMID: 16473072. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.07.063.
14. Baranskaja E.K., Shul’pekova Ju.O. The principles of management of patients with short bowel syndrome. Russkij medicinskij zhurnal. 2010; 18(13): 789–794. (In Russian).
15. Westergaard H. Short bowel syndrome. Semin Gastrointest Dis. 2002; 13(4): 210–20. PMID: 12462707.
16. Tappenden K.A. Mechanisms of enteral nutrient-enchanced intestinal adaptation. Gastroenterology. 2006; 130(2 Suppl 1): S93–S99. PMID: 16473079. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.11.051.
17. Lal S., Teubner A., Shaffer J.L. Review article: intestinal failure. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006; 24(1): 19–31. PMID: 16803600. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.02941.x.
18. Weale A.R., Edwards A.G., Bailey M., Lear P.A. Intestinal adaptation after massive intestinal resection. Postgrad Med J. 2005; 81 (953): 178–184. PMID: 15749794. DOI: 10.1136/pgmj.2004.023846
19. Drozdowski L.D., Clandinin M.T., Thomson A.B. Morphological, kinetic, membrane biochemical and genetic aspects of intestinal enteroplasticity. World J Gastroenterol. 2009; 15(7): 774–787. PMID: 19230039.
Review
For citations:
Yartsev P.A., Titova G.P., Grishin A.V., Vodyasov A.V., Podlovchenko T.G., Petukhova M.N., Papaninov A.S., Kislitsyna O.S. COMPENSATORY OPPORTUNITIES OF THE SMALL INTESTINE AFTER EXTENSIVE DISTAL AND PROXIMAL RESECTION (EXPERIMENTAL STUDY). Russian Sklifosovsky Journal "Emergency Medical Care". 2017;6(2):124-131. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.23934/2223-9022-2017-6-2-104-111