Radiosurgical Treatment of a Patient With a Ruptured Arteriovenous Malformation Located in a Functionally Significant Area

Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) of the brain are quite rare vascular pathologies, but they are life-threatening, due to the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage. Stereotactic radiosurgical treatment of patients with cerebral AVM is performed in cases where surgical removal is impossible or embolization with a stable occlusive effect cannot be performed. Currently, for the diagnosis of AVM, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used because of its noninvasiveness and minimal risks. When a malformation is located in a functionally significant area, then a non-invasive technique is used to assess its interposition and mapping - functional magnetic resonance imaging.

We have presented the experience of radiosurgical treatment of a 43-year-old male patient with a ruptured AVM located in the left temporal lobe, near Wernicke’s area. The patient underwent stereotactic radiosurgical treatment with Elekta Leksell Gamma Knife Perfection device, taking into account the location of the AVM in a functionally significant area, preoperative mapping was performed. After two years, according to MR angiography, the arterial component in the projection of the irradiated AVM was not visualized, which was confirmed by the data of cerebral angiography. Thus, a clinical example has demonstrated the high efficiency of MRI in the diagnosis and assessment of the results of the performed stereotactic radiosurgical treatment of AVMs. 

1. Bokhari MR, Bokhari SRA. Arteriovenous Malformation of The Brain. StatPearls Treasure Island (FL); 2019. PMID: 28613495 Bookshelf ID: NBK430744

2. Abecassis IJ, Xu DS, Batjer HH, Bendok BR. Natural history of brain arteriovenous malformations: a systematic review. Neurosurgical Focus. 2014;37(3):E7. PMID: 25175445 https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.6.FOCUS14250

3. Stapf C, Mohr JP, Pile-Spellman J, Solomon RA, Sacco RL, Connolly ES Jr. Epidemiology and natural history of arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgical Focus. 2001;11(5):e1. PMID: 16466233 https://doi.org/10.3171/foc.2001.11.5.2

4. Inoue HK, Ohye C. Hemorrhage risks and obliteration rates of arteriovenous malformations after gamma knife radiosurgery. J Neurosurg. 2002;97(5 Suppl): 474–476. PMID: 12507079 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2002.97.supplement

5. Szeifert GT, Levivier M, Lorenzoni J, Nyáry I, Major O, Kemeny AA. Morphological observations in brain arteriovenous malformations after gamma knife radiosurgery. Prog Neurol Surg. 2013;27:119–129. PMID: 23258516 https://doi.org/10.1159/000341772

6. Maryashev SA. Stereotaksicheskoe obluchenie arteriovenoznykh mal’formatsiy golovnogo mozga: dr. med. sci. diss. Moscow: Nauch.- issled. in-t neyrokhirurgii im. N.N. Burdenko, 2016. (in Russ.) Available at: https://docplayer.ru/41342176-Maryashev-sergey-alekseevichstereotaksicheskoe-obluchenie-arteriovenoznyh-malformaciygolovnogo-mozga.html [Accessed Nov 19, 2021]

7. Yen CP, Ding D, Cheng CH, Starke RM, Shaffrey M, Sheehan J. Gamma Knife surgery for incidental cerebral arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg. 2014;121(5):1015–1021. PMID: 25148009 https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.7.JNS131397

8. Kano H, Kondziolka D, Flickinger JC, Park KJ, Parry PV, Yang HC, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations, Part 6: multistaged volumetric management of large arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg. 2012;116(1):54–65. PMID: 22077447 https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.9.JNS11177

9. Izawa M, Hayashi M, Chernov M, Nakaya K, Ochiai T, Murata N, et al. Long-term complications after gamma knife surgery for arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg. 2005;102(Suppl):34–37. PMID: 15662777 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2005.102.s_supplement.0034

10. Chang JH, Chang JW, Park YG, Chang SS. Factors related to complete occlusion of arteriovenous malformations after gamma knife radiosurgery. J Neurosurg. 2000;93 (Suppl 3):96–101. PMID: 11143271 https://doi.org/10.3171/sup.2000.93.supplement3.0096

11. Pollock BE, Gorman DA, Brown PD. Radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations of the basal ganglia, thalamus, and brainstem. J Neurosurg. 2004;100(2):210–214. PMID: 15086226 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2004.100.2.0210

12. Hadizadeh DR, von Falkenhausen M, Gieseke J, Meyer B, Urbach H, Hoogeveen R, et al. Cerebral arteriovenous malformation: Spetzler-Martin classification at subsecond-temporal-resolution fourdimensional MR angiography compared with that at DSA. Radiology. 2008;246(1):205– 213. PMID: 17951352 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2453061684

13. Radiosurgery Practice Guideline Initiative. Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Patients with Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations (AVM). Radiosurgery Practice Guideline Report #2-03. Issued March 2009. Available at: https://pdf4pro.com/view/radiosurgery-practiceguideline-initiative-stereotactic-32d2f5.html [Accessed Nov 19, 2021]

14. Abdelaziz O, Shereen A, Inoue T, Hirai H, Shima A. Correlation of Appearance of MRI Perinidal T2 Hyperintensity Signal and Eventual Nidus Obliteration Following Photon Radiosurgery of Brain AVMs: Combined Results of LINAC and Gamma Knife Centers. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2019;80(3):187–197. PMID: 30895568 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1678710