Glasgow Coma Scale: Linguistic-Cultural Adaptation of the Russian Version
https://doi.org/10.23934/2223-9022-2021-10-1-91-99
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Determination of the degree of depression of consciousness in patients with brain damage upon admission to the intensive care unit and intensive therapy is a primary task. In order to carry out a quick and at the same time sufficiently complete assessment of this kind, in 1974 neurosurgeons Graham Teasdale and Bryan Jennett from the University of Glasgow developed an algorithm consisting of a sequential series of tests in the form of eye opening, speech and motor responses, called Glasgow Coma Scale. This scale has received worldwide recognition and for many decades has been the main one for determining the state of consciousness in the most severe patients with brain damage. The absence of a validated version of this scale complicates its application in Russia, and the use of currently available versions that have not passed all the necessary stages of validation distorts the originally intended meaning of the scale and does not allow obtaining reliable clinical results when examining patients with acute impairment of consciousness.
AIM OF STUDY Development of the official Russianlanguage version of the Glasgow Coma Scale, taking into account linguistic and cultural characteristics (1st stage of the validation study).
MATERIAL AND METHODS The staff of Center for Validation of Health Status Questionnaires and Scales in Russia, Research Center of Neurology obtained consent from G. Teasdale to validate Glasgow Coma Scale in Russia. Two Russianspeaking professional certified translators in the field of medicine performed a direct translation of the original Englishlanguage scale, and a reverse translation was carried out by native speakers with a medical education. Pilot study was performed in 15 patients with acute impairment of consciousness, two meetings of the expert committee were held (before and after pilot study).
RESULTS Based on the results of the first meeting of the expert commission, a linguistic and cultural adaptation of the text of the scale was carried out. During the pilot testing of the researchers did not have difficulties in understanding and interpreting instructions. As a result, the second meeting of the expert commission was held and the final Russianlanguage version was approved, which is presented in this article and is available on the website of Center for Validation of Health Status Questionnaires and Scales in Russia, Research Center of Neurology.
CONCLUSION For the first time, the Russian language version of the Glasgow Coma Scale was officially presented and recommended for use both in clinical and research practice in Russia and other Russian speaking countries. The next publication will highlight the result of assessing the psychometric properties (reproducibility, interexpert agreement and sensitivity) of the Russianlanguage version of the scale.
About the Authors
M. A. PiradovRussian Federation
Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Director
80 Volokolamskoye Hwy, Moscow, 123365, Russian Federation
N. A. Suponeva
Russian Federation
Doctor of Medical Sciences, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Chief Researcher of the Department of Neurorehabilitation and Physiotherapy
80 Volokolamskoye Hwy, Moscow, 123365, Russian Federation
Yu. V. Ryabinkina
Russian Federation
Doctor of Medical Sciences, Leading Researcher of the Department of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation with Intensive Care Units
80 Volokolamskoye Hwy, Moscow, 123365, Russian Federation
E. V. Gnedovskaya
Russian Federation
Candidate of Medical Sciences, Deputy Director for Scientific and Organizational Work and Development
80 Volokolamskoye Hwy, Moscow, 123365, Russian Federation
K. A. Ilyina
Russian Federation
Neurologist of the Scientific Consultative Department, postgraduate student
80 Volokolamskoye Hwy, Moscow, 123365, Russian Federation
1 Leninskiye gory, Moscow, 119191, Russian Federation
D. G. Yusupova
Russian Federation
Candidate of Medical Sciences, Junior Researcher at the Department of Neurorehabilitation and Physiotherapy
80 Volokolamskoye Hwy, Moscow, 123365, Russian Federation
A. A. Zimin
Russian Federation
Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Researcher, Department of Neurorehabilitation and Physiotherapy
80 Volokolamskoye Hwy, Moscow, 123365, Russian Federation
L. A. Legostaeva
Russian Federation
Candidate of Medical Sciences, Junior Researcher, Department of Neurorehabilitation and Physiotherapy
80 Volokolamskoye Hwy, Moscow, 123365, Russian Federation
E. G. Yazeva
Russian Federation
Neurologist, Laboratory Researcher of the Department of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation with Intensive Care Units
80 Volokolamskoye Hwy, Moscow, 123365, Russian Federation
I. S. Bakulin
Russian Federation
Candidate of Medical Sciences, Junior Researcher, Department of Neurorehabilitation and Physiotherapy
80 Volokolamskoye Hwy, Moscow, 123365, Russian Federation
A. B. Zaitsev
Russian Federation
Candidate of Philology, Associate Professor of the Institute of Linguistics and Intercultural Communication of the Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education
8, bldg. 2 Trubetskaya St., Moscow, 119048, Russian Federation
N. V. Polekhina
Russian Federation
Neurologist
80 Volokolamskoye Hwy, Moscow, 123365, Russian Federation
P. Bundhun
Russian Federation
Resident
6 Miklukho-Maklaya St., Moscow, 117198, Russian Federation
N. M. Ramchandani
Russian Federation
Resident
6 Miklukho-Maklaya St., Moscow, 117198, Russian Federation
V. Y. Samorukov
Russian Federation
Candidate of Medical Sciences, Head of the Department of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation No. 35
5 2nd Botkinsky proyezd, Moscow, 125284, Russian Federation
M. A. Domashenko
Russian Federation
Candidate of Medical Sciences, Chief Physician of Central Clinical Medical and Sanitary Unit
18/9 Naberezhnaya St., Chelyabinsk region, Magnitogorsk, 455023, Russian Federation
References
1. Kanich W, Brady WJ, Huff JS, Perron AD, Holstege C, Lindbeck G, et al. Altered mental status: evaluation and etiology in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2002;20(7):613–617. PMID: 12442240 https://doi.org/10.1053/ajem.2002.35464
2. Forsberg S, Hojer J, Ludwigs U, Nystrom H. Metabolic vs structural coma in the ED – An observational study. Am J Emerg Med. 2012;30(9):1986–1890. PMID: 22795990 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2012.04.032
3. Posner JB, C. B. Super, N. Schiff, Plum F. Plum and Posner’s diagnosis of stupor and coma. Contemporary neurology series. 4 edn. Oxford University Press; 2008.
4. Horsting M, Franken M, Meulenbelt J, van Klei W, de Lange D. The etiology and outcome of non-traumatic coma in critical care: a systematic review. BMC Anesthesiology. 2015;15(1):65. PMID: 25924678 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-015-0041-9
5. Obiako OR, Oparah S, Ogunniyi A. Causes of medical coma in adult patients at the University College Hospital. Ibadan Nigeria Niger Postgrad Med J. 2011;18(1):1–7. PMID: 21445104
6. Matuja WB, Matekere NJ. Causes and early prognosis of non-traumatic coma in Tanzania. Muhimbili Medical Centre experience. Trop Geogr Med. 1987;39(4):330–335. PMID: 3451407
7. Owolabi LF, Mohammed AD, Dalhat MM, Ibrahim A, Aliyu S, Owolabi DS. Factors associated with death and predictors of 1-month mortality in nontraumatic coma in a tertiary hospital in Northwestern Nigeria. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2013;17(4):219–223. PMID: 24133329 PMCID: PMC3796900 https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-5229.118422
8. Sinclair JR, Watters DA, Bagshaw A. Non-traumatic coma in Zambia. Trop Doct. 1989;19(1):6-10. PMID: 2922823 https://doi.org/10.1177/004947558901900103
9. Peeters W, van den Brande R, Polinder S, Brazinova A, Steyerberg E, Lingsma H et al. Epidemiology of traumatic brain injury in Europe. Acta Neurochir. 2015;157(10):1683–1696. PMID: 26269030 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-015-2512-7
10. Salottolo K, Carrick M, Stewart Lewy A, Morgan B, Slone D, Bar-Or D. The Epidemiology, Prognosis, and Trends of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury with Presenting Glasgow Coma Scale of 3. Journal of Critical Care. 2017;38:197–201. PMID: 27940095 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.11.034
11. Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. Lancet. 1974; 304(7872):81–84. PMID: 4136544 https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(74)91639-0
12. Teasdale G, Knill-Jones R, Van Der Sande J. Observer variability in assessing impaired consciousness and coma. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1978;41(7):603–610. PMID: 690637 https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.41.7.603
13. Braakman R, Avezaat CJJ, Maas AIR, Roel M, Schouten HJA. Inter observer agreement in the assessment of the motor response of the Glasgow ‘coma’ scale. Clin Neurol Neurosurgery. 1978;80(2):100-106. PMID: 533856 https://doi.org/10.1016/s0303-8467(78)80067-5
14. Menegazzi JJ, Davis EA, Sucov AN, Paris PM. Reliability of the Glasgow Coma Scale when used by emergency physicians and paramedics. J Trauma. 1993;34(1):46–48. PMID: 8437195 https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199301000-00008
15. Wier CJ, Bradford APJ, Lees KR. Ischaemic stroke. The prognostic value of the components of the Glasgow Coma Scale following acute stroke. Quarterly Journal of Medicine. 2003;96(1):67–74. PMID: 12509651 https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcg008
16. Teasdale G, Drake C, Hunt W, Kassell N, Sano K, Pertuiset B, De Villiers J. A universal subarachnoid hemorrhage scale: report of a committee of the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1988;51(11):1457. PMID: 3236024 https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.51.11.1457
17. Hemphill J, Bonovich D, Besmertis L, Manley G, Johnston S. The ICH Score. A Simple, Reliable Grading Scale for Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Stroke. 2001;32(4):891–897. PMID: 11283388 https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.32.4.891
18. Schutte CM, van der Meyden СН. A prospective study of glasgow coma scale (GCS), age, CSF-neutrophil count, and CSF-protein and glucose levels as prognostic indicators in 100 adult patients with meningitis. Journal of Infection. 1998;37(2):112–115. PMID: 9821083 https://doi.org/10.1016/s0163-4453(98)80163-1
19. Tseng Jen-Ho, Tseng Ming-Yuan. Brain abscess in 142 patients: factors influencing outcome and mortality. Surgical Neurology. 2006;65(6):557–562. PMID: 16720170 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surneu.2005.09.029
20. Heard K, Bebarta VS. Reliability of the Glasgow Coma Scale for the emergency department evaluation of poisoned patients. Human & experimental toxicology. 2004;23(4):197–200. PMID: 15171571 https://doi.org/10.1191/0960327104ht436oa
21. Hunt WE, Hess RM. Surgical risk as related to time of intervention in the repair of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 1968;28:14–20. PMID: 5635959 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1968.28.1.0014
22. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985;13(10):818–829. PMID: 3928249 https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-198510000-00009
23. Boyd CR, Tolson MA, Copes WS. Evaluating trauma care: the TRISS method. Trauma Score and the Injury Severity Score. J Trauma. 1987;27(4):370–378. PMID: 3106646 https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-198704000-00005
24. Wijdicks EF, Bamlet WR, Maramattom BV, Manno EM, McClelland RL. Validation of a new coma scale: the FOUR score. Ann Neurol. 2005;58(4):585–593. PMID: 16178024 https://doi.org/ 10.1002/ana.20611
25. Пирадов М.А., Супонева Н.А., Рябинкина Ю.В., Сергеев Д.В., Легостаева Л.А., Язева Е.Г., и др. Шкала подробной оценки состояния ареактивных пациентов (Full Outline of UnResponsiveness, FOUR): лингво-культурная адаптация русскоязычной версии. Анналы клинической и экспериментальной неврологии. 2019;13(3): 47–54. https://doi.org/10.25692/ACEN.2019.3.7
26. Teasdale G, Jennett B, Murray L, Murray G. Glasgow coma scale: to sum or not to sum. Lancet. 1983;322(8351):678. PMID: 6136811 https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(83)92550-3
27. Teoh LS, Gowardman JR, Larsen PD, Green R, Galletly DC. Glasgow Coma Scale: variation in mortality among permutations of specific total scores. Intensive Care Med. 2000;26(2):157–161. PMID: 10784302 https://doi.org/10.1007/s001340050039
28. Kornbluth J, Bhardwaj A. Evaluation of coma: a critical appraisal of popular scoring systems. Neurocrit Care. 2011;14(1):134–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-010-9409-3
29. Teasdale G, Maas A, Lecky F, Manley G, Stocchetti N, Murray G. The Glasgow Coma Scale at 40 years: Standing the test of time. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(8):844–854. PMID: 25030516 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70120-6
30. Roca G, Mayol S, Garcia E, Casajuana E, Quintana S. Spanish versions of the Simplified Motor Score and the Glasgow Coma Scale in out-of-hospital treatment of head injury in adults: a preliminary study of each scale’s ability to predict adverse events. Emergencias. 2015;27(3):185–188. PMID:29077312 https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/289803
31. Reith FC, Van den Brande R, Synnot A, Gruen R, Maas AI. The reliability of the Glasgow Coma Scale: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42(1):3–15. PMID: 26564211 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-015-4124-3
32. Chou R, Totten AM, Carney N, Dandy S, Fu R, Grusing S. et al. Predictive Utility of the Total Glasgow Coma Scale Versus the Motor Component of the Glasgow Coma Scale for Identification of Patients With Serious Traumatic Injuries. Ann Emerg Med. 2017;70(2):143–157. PMID: 28089112 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.11.032
33. Bloch F. J Is the Glasgow Coma Scale appropriate for the evaluation of elderly patients in long-term care units? Eval Clin Pract. 2016;22(3):455-456. PMID: 26687582 https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12489
34. Borgialli DA, Mahajan P, Hoyle JD Jr, Powell EC, Nadel FM, Tunik MG. et al. Performance of the Pediatric Glasgow Coma Scale Score in the Evaluation of Children With Blunt Head Trauma. Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN). Acad Emerg Med. 2016;23(8):878–884. PMID: 27197686 https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.13014
Review
For citations:
Piradov M.A., Suponeva N.A., Ryabinkina Yu.V., Gnedovskaya E.V., Ilyina K.A., Yusupova D.G., Zimin A.A., Legostaeva L.A., Yazeva E.G., Bakulin I.S., Zaitsev A.B., Polekhina N.V., Bundhun P., Ramchandani N.M., Samorukov V.Y., Domashenko M.A. Glasgow Coma Scale: Linguistic-Cultural Adaptation of the Russian Version. Russian Sklifosovsky Journal "Emergency Medical Care". 2021;10(1):91-99. https://doi.org/10.23934/2223-9022-2021-10-1-91-99